Recently friends from the plane to shoot a military port in China, you can see the military docked in the Chinese Navy's Liaoning aircraft carrier. In addition to aircraft carriers, there are a large number of military vessels.
2017年3月15日星期三
Aerial China version of "Battleship Street" Liaoning aircraft carrier is clearly visible
Aerial China version of "Battleship Street" Liaoning aircraft carrier is clearly visible
Recently friends from the plane to shoot a military port in China, you can see the military docked in the Chinese Navy's Liaoning aircraft carrier. In addition to aircraft carriers, there are a large number of military vessels.
Recently friends from the plane to shoot a military port in China, you can see the military docked in the Chinese Navy's Liaoning aircraft carrier. In addition to aircraft carriers, there are a large number of military vessels.
China is developing high-speed stealth unmanned aerial vehicles: can act as a long-range bombers
China is developing high-speed stealth unmanned aerial vehicles: can act as a long-range bombers
US Hezhong International News Agency reported on March 9, China is developing to avoid incoming weapons and radar detection of unmanned aerial vehicles. The speed of this UAV is very fast.
"China Daily" reported that China's largest missile manufacturer China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation said that this UAV may be in the air when the long-range bombers to use. China Aerospace Science and Industry Group, deputy general manager Wei Yiyin said that the current development of two UAVs, one is a long flight stealth unmanned aerial vehicles, the other is near space UAV.
Wei Yiyin told reporters that the military reform to the world's armed forces have undergone enormous changes, unmanned aerial vehicles as a result of high-resolution reconnaissance, remote precision strike, anti-submarine warfare and air combat play an important role in becoming an indispensable modern war Weapons. These unmanned aerial vehicles are developed by Beijing according to the "13th Five-Year Plan".
Reported that China not only want to deploy UAVs in the country, and want to sell them to interested foreign buyers. China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation of the UAV is similar to cruise missiles, the current market in the sale of military unmanned aerial vehicles have WJ-500, WJ-600 and WJ-600A / D and other models. UAVs are generally launched from the car, descended through the parachute and then recovered.
The WJ-600A / D UAV cruise is very fast at speeds of 435 miles (1.6 miles per mile) and more than twice the speed of existing unmanned aerial vehicles in China. China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation UAV Technology Institute said that the machine also has stealth performance, from the military radar point of view like a bird.
US Hezhong International News Agency reported on March 9, China is developing to avoid incoming weapons and radar detection of unmanned aerial vehicles. The speed of this UAV is very fast.
"China Daily" reported that China's largest missile manufacturer China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation said that this UAV may be in the air when the long-range bombers to use. China Aerospace Science and Industry Group, deputy general manager Wei Yiyin said that the current development of two UAVs, one is a long flight stealth unmanned aerial vehicles, the other is near space UAV.
Wei Yiyin told reporters that the military reform to the world's armed forces have undergone enormous changes, unmanned aerial vehicles as a result of high-resolution reconnaissance, remote precision strike, anti-submarine warfare and air combat play an important role in becoming an indispensable modern war Weapons. These unmanned aerial vehicles are developed by Beijing according to the "13th Five-Year Plan".
Reported that China not only want to deploy UAVs in the country, and want to sell them to interested foreign buyers. China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation of the UAV is similar to cruise missiles, the current market in the sale of military unmanned aerial vehicles have WJ-500, WJ-600 and WJ-600A / D and other models. UAVs are generally launched from the car, descended through the parachute and then recovered.
The WJ-600A / D UAV cruise is very fast at speeds of 435 miles (1.6 miles per mile) and more than twice the speed of existing unmanned aerial vehicles in China. China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation UAV Technology Institute said that the machine also has stealth performance, from the military radar point of view like a bird.
China in Xisha "new infrastructure"
China in Xisha "new infrastructure"
Reuters reported on the 14th, the latest satellite images show that China has begun in the South China Sea to start a new construction project, which became "Beijing to continue in this important channel to strengthen the military signal." The report quoted anonymous regional military experts as saying that even if they want to avoid a new confrontation with the United States, but this action shows that China is still determined to build the island reef network. In this regard, the Chinese military experts Li Jie 15, "Global Times" reporter said that China in their own control of the island reef construction of civil facilities, other countries have no right to interfere, outside the country in particular, there is no right.
Reuters said the satellite picture from the private satellite company planet laboratory. The report said that one of the pictures taken on March 6 in Xisha North Island shows that recent projects include land clearing and suspected port preparation, some experts speculate that this will eventually be "armament facilities". The initial project was destroyed in the typhoon last year. The report also said that in January this year, there have been reports, in the island of Sao Shau Island, such as the island has started the project.
"The future of any control of the South China Sea in China, the Xisha Islands are essential," Australian Defense Institute South China issue expert Carl Saiye claimed that we can see that China has determined the militarization of the determination. An anonymous US official expressed a similar view that "can not confirm China's new project in the North Island", but this is not surprised. Reuters said that the North Island is part of the Xisha arc-shaped reef, is considered to be the barrier of Yongxing Island, Yongxing Island, civil facilities and monitoring stations.
In this regard, the Chinese military experts Li Jie 15 days in an interview with the "Global Times" reporter said that China in the South China Sea region to enjoy a legitimate and legitimate right, with indisputable waters and island reef sovereignty. In the construction of the reefs, China has mainly highlighted the construction of civilian facilities such as lighthouse, civil airport and humanitarian relief, and assisted the international community in countering terrorism and anti-piracy and jointly maintaining marine safety. Naval Military Research Institute researcher Zhang Jun Society stressed that China's construction in Xisha is part of the land defense. Compared to the Nansha Islands, the Xisha Islands closer to mainland China, nor with other countries of the territorial dispute, not to mention China's construction of the island reefs on the South China Sea navigation did not have any impact.
While the latest speculation on the South China Sea issue, Reuters also noted that China does not want to confront the South China Sea issue with the United States, at the same time, also try to peace with other Southeast Asian countries to solve the South China Sea issue. Li Jie told the "Global Times" reporter said that China strongly opposed to interference in foreign countries to intervene in regional affairs, while calling on the country through the negotiations, consultation and exchange, and jointly properly solve the problem. But if there are individual countries deliberately want to mix the benefits of water, or take unfriendly behavior, China should also be ready to "fight dog stick."
Reuters reported on the 14th, the latest satellite images show that China has begun in the South China Sea to start a new construction project, which became "Beijing to continue in this important channel to strengthen the military signal." The report quoted anonymous regional military experts as saying that even if they want to avoid a new confrontation with the United States, but this action shows that China is still determined to build the island reef network. In this regard, the Chinese military experts Li Jie 15, "Global Times" reporter said that China in their own control of the island reef construction of civil facilities, other countries have no right to interfere, outside the country in particular, there is no right.
Reuters said the satellite picture from the private satellite company planet laboratory. The report said that one of the pictures taken on March 6 in Xisha North Island shows that recent projects include land clearing and suspected port preparation, some experts speculate that this will eventually be "armament facilities". The initial project was destroyed in the typhoon last year. The report also said that in January this year, there have been reports, in the island of Sao Shau Island, such as the island has started the project.
"The future of any control of the South China Sea in China, the Xisha Islands are essential," Australian Defense Institute South China issue expert Carl Saiye claimed that we can see that China has determined the militarization of the determination. An anonymous US official expressed a similar view that "can not confirm China's new project in the North Island", but this is not surprised. Reuters said that the North Island is part of the Xisha arc-shaped reef, is considered to be the barrier of Yongxing Island, Yongxing Island, civil facilities and monitoring stations.
In this regard, the Chinese military experts Li Jie 15 days in an interview with the "Global Times" reporter said that China in the South China Sea region to enjoy a legitimate and legitimate right, with indisputable waters and island reef sovereignty. In the construction of the reefs, China has mainly highlighted the construction of civilian facilities such as lighthouse, civil airport and humanitarian relief, and assisted the international community in countering terrorism and anti-piracy and jointly maintaining marine safety. Naval Military Research Institute researcher Zhang Jun Society stressed that China's construction in Xisha is part of the land defense. Compared to the Nansha Islands, the Xisha Islands closer to mainland China, nor with other countries of the territorial dispute, not to mention China's construction of the island reefs on the South China Sea navigation did not have any impact.
While the latest speculation on the South China Sea issue, Reuters also noted that China does not want to confront the South China Sea issue with the United States, at the same time, also try to peace with other Southeast Asian countries to solve the South China Sea issue. Li Jie told the "Global Times" reporter said that China strongly opposed to interference in foreign countries to intervene in regional affairs, while calling on the country through the negotiations, consultation and exchange, and jointly properly solve the problem. But if there are individual countries deliberately want to mix the benefits of water, or take unfriendly behavior, China should also be ready to "fight dog stick."
Indian Army refused to Aqiong Tank: overweight bridge can not afford
Indian Army refused to Aqiong Tank: overweight bridge can not afford
India's defense news media livefist reported on March 15 that the Indian Army did not want to accept the new Aqiong Tank, because the Aqiong tank overweight problem has led to India's roads and bridges can not afford. Continue to promote the Aqiong Tank project reasons only because the Indian government's "Made in India" demand.
For the Arjun Tank Indian Army and even some people stand, let this guy in the New Delhi King Avenue good parade it, it can not get out of the desert here.
Livefist said that India's Arjun main battle tank, may be the country's longest, most troublesome armament plan, creating the most terrible trouble in history. This is a problem because of the quality of the customer can never meet the quality requirements of the program. This tortuous tragedy is derived from the Indian Army's request after the 1971 war in India and Pakistan. In terms of technology, Aqiong Tank is an illusion that can never meet the requirements.
In the Aqiong tank research and development process, the platform weight problem has led to Arjun was rejected by the Indian Army. Existing India has deployed a total of 118 Aqiong tanks, mainly equipped in the western desert area of the two tank regiment. The military ordered in 2014 for the Aqiong Tank upgrade and add accessories, upgraded Aqiong Tank was named Arjun MK2 type.
Indian Army refused to Aqiong tank due to overweight bridge can not afford
Equipped with remote control weapons and so on the advanced stuff Arjuna MK2 looks really a bit advanced sense.
The Indian Defense Commission issued a report in which some of the familiar, so that the troops feel familiar with the Aqiong tank problem has re-emerged, such as weight.
Arjun MK2 weighs 68.6 tons, more than the MK1 stage of 6 tons, in the western desert response to the process of Pakistan, Arjun MK2 weight is not suitable for deployment in the desert, the Indian Army hopes that the Defense Research and Development Organization can not remove the main Improve the case of re-design of the body and turret, the use of new materials to replace the traditional structure to achieve a reasonable weight.
India's Defense Research and Development Organization's Vehicle Research Division has already claimed an ambitious goal to lose Aqiong Tank by 3 tons.
But in fact it seems that there is no change in the situation, in September 2016 meeting, the Army proposed, 65 tons can not meet the requirements, in fact, even reduced to 62 tons, that is, the weight of Arjun MK1, can not let The Indian Army gains any meaningful tactical advantage.
That is, the Indian Army that the existing weight loss project is no effect. And for the Indian Army is even worse, even if the weight loss of 3 tons of the project from the demonstration to the actual acceptance also takes 4-6 years. This is clearly not in line with the needs of the army, clearly shows that the government imposed pressure on the military to continue the project.
The Defense Development and Development Organization (DRDO), which is pushing the Arjun project, is another burden of the Indian Army to throw away Arjun. DRDO that Aqiong tanks in the desert semi-desert terrain has been demonstrated enough maneuverability, and asked the Army to its T-90 tanks with all-round comparison. The military believes that as a medium tank T-90 and heavy tank Arjun both have different tactical needs and deployment methods, do not need this contrast.
But now a reality is that India's existing bridges and roads can not carry the weight of Arjun MK2 tanks, if you want to fully deploy Arjun MK2, unless the Indian national bridge and other infrastructure to strengthen the road. This is unprecedented for the Indian government. And Arjuna family tanks are mainly aimed at dealing with the potential danger of war with Pakistan, of course, its weight can not be shipped to the battlefield of China, let alone even the railway carrying Arjun have difficulties.
Another reality is that nearly 100 Arjun still in the absence of foreign parts can not repair the state, the Arjun sold to the Army now the only reason is to meet the needs of DRDO.
Indian Army sources said that even if the Indian government for Arjun this "Made in India" product endorsement, the Army is not going to continue to accept Aqiong tanks. The highest accepted bottom line is only limited to four to five regiments in the west. Even under pressure from the government, the Army would prefer to have more T-90 and India's Future Combat Vehicle Project (FRCV) new main battle tanks.
Indian Army refused to Aqiong tank due to overweight bridge can not afford
... but the FRCV program was also dominated by DRDO, which had previously described the indicators of the main battle tanks in the Indian Future Fighting Vehicle Project ... that is, it is impossible for India to complete the task, the Indian Army of this argument most Is threw the arrogance of Arjun it. Anyway, the efficiency of DRDO, drag a few decades and the development of an Arjun, when the time can then pass the skin.
And for DRDO, if the Aqiong tank no more than 500 tanks of the order, the project can be declared dead.
India's defense news media livefist reported on March 15 that the Indian Army did not want to accept the new Aqiong Tank, because the Aqiong tank overweight problem has led to India's roads and bridges can not afford. Continue to promote the Aqiong Tank project reasons only because the Indian government's "Made in India" demand.
For the Arjun Tank Indian Army and even some people stand, let this guy in the New Delhi King Avenue good parade it, it can not get out of the desert here.
Livefist said that India's Arjun main battle tank, may be the country's longest, most troublesome armament plan, creating the most terrible trouble in history. This is a problem because of the quality of the customer can never meet the quality requirements of the program. This tortuous tragedy is derived from the Indian Army's request after the 1971 war in India and Pakistan. In terms of technology, Aqiong Tank is an illusion that can never meet the requirements.
In the Aqiong tank research and development process, the platform weight problem has led to Arjun was rejected by the Indian Army. Existing India has deployed a total of 118 Aqiong tanks, mainly equipped in the western desert area of the two tank regiment. The military ordered in 2014 for the Aqiong Tank upgrade and add accessories, upgraded Aqiong Tank was named Arjun MK2 type.
Indian Army refused to Aqiong tank due to overweight bridge can not afford
Equipped with remote control weapons and so on the advanced stuff Arjuna MK2 looks really a bit advanced sense.
The Indian Defense Commission issued a report in which some of the familiar, so that the troops feel familiar with the Aqiong tank problem has re-emerged, such as weight.
Arjun MK2 weighs 68.6 tons, more than the MK1 stage of 6 tons, in the western desert response to the process of Pakistan, Arjun MK2 weight is not suitable for deployment in the desert, the Indian Army hopes that the Defense Research and Development Organization can not remove the main Improve the case of re-design of the body and turret, the use of new materials to replace the traditional structure to achieve a reasonable weight.
India's Defense Research and Development Organization's Vehicle Research Division has already claimed an ambitious goal to lose Aqiong Tank by 3 tons.
But in fact it seems that there is no change in the situation, in September 2016 meeting, the Army proposed, 65 tons can not meet the requirements, in fact, even reduced to 62 tons, that is, the weight of Arjun MK1, can not let The Indian Army gains any meaningful tactical advantage.
That is, the Indian Army that the existing weight loss project is no effect. And for the Indian Army is even worse, even if the weight loss of 3 tons of the project from the demonstration to the actual acceptance also takes 4-6 years. This is clearly not in line with the needs of the army, clearly shows that the government imposed pressure on the military to continue the project.
The Defense Development and Development Organization (DRDO), which is pushing the Arjun project, is another burden of the Indian Army to throw away Arjun. DRDO that Aqiong tanks in the desert semi-desert terrain has been demonstrated enough maneuverability, and asked the Army to its T-90 tanks with all-round comparison. The military believes that as a medium tank T-90 and heavy tank Arjun both have different tactical needs and deployment methods, do not need this contrast.
But now a reality is that India's existing bridges and roads can not carry the weight of Arjun MK2 tanks, if you want to fully deploy Arjun MK2, unless the Indian national bridge and other infrastructure to strengthen the road. This is unprecedented for the Indian government. And Arjuna family tanks are mainly aimed at dealing with the potential danger of war with Pakistan, of course, its weight can not be shipped to the battlefield of China, let alone even the railway carrying Arjun have difficulties.
Another reality is that nearly 100 Arjun still in the absence of foreign parts can not repair the state, the Arjun sold to the Army now the only reason is to meet the needs of DRDO.
Indian Army sources said that even if the Indian government for Arjun this "Made in India" product endorsement, the Army is not going to continue to accept Aqiong tanks. The highest accepted bottom line is only limited to four to five regiments in the west. Even under pressure from the government, the Army would prefer to have more T-90 and India's Future Combat Vehicle Project (FRCV) new main battle tanks.
Indian Army refused to Aqiong tank due to overweight bridge can not afford
... but the FRCV program was also dominated by DRDO, which had previously described the indicators of the main battle tanks in the Indian Future Fighting Vehicle Project ... that is, it is impossible for India to complete the task, the Indian Army of this argument most Is threw the arrogance of Arjun it. Anyway, the efficiency of DRDO, drag a few decades and the development of an Arjun, when the time can then pass the skin.
And for DRDO, if the Aqiong tank no more than 500 tanks of the order, the project can be declared dead.
The United States to give up to return to Asia-Pacific Australia experts anxious: This will allow China to take the initiative
The United States to give up to return to Asia-Pacific Australia experts anxious: This will allow China to take the initiative
"Return to Asia-Pacific" "Asia-Pacific rebalance", these Obama's efforts to promote the strategy has been "officially dead." Local time on the 13th, the US State Department Acting Assistant Secretary of State Susan Thornton (Chinese name Dong Yunchang) announced the news. She said that the Trump government's Asia-Pacific policy will have a new program, but it is not yet formed. Dong Yung-chun made the remarks when US Secretary of State Tillerson opened his first trip to Asia. He arrived in Japan on the 15th and will visit South Korea and China in the following days. The outside world is very concerned about his words and deeds, apparently hope to find a clue about the new US Asia-Pacific policy.
Dong Yunchang is responsible for East Asian affairs in the US Department of State. US Defense News Network reported on the 14th, when talking about the Trump government's Asia-Pacific policy, she told reporters on the 13th, "return to Asia-Pacific, Asia-Pacific rebalancing are all the Obama administration's Asian policy words, you can expect The new government will have its own program. " She said that although the program has not yet seen anything in the details, but it is certain that the Obama administration's "return to Asia-Pacific" strategy has been "officially dead."
That does not mean that the United States will give up Asia. When asked about the future of the strategy, Dong said that the Trump government realized that the Asia-Pacific region had great economic potential and that the United States would increase its participation in Asia-Pacific and continue to live and remain alive in Asia. The United States will promote fair and free trade in Asia, handle security issues in North Korea and other regions, and continue to promote a constructive, rule-based, peaceful and stable Asian order. Fudan University Institute of International Studies executive vice president Wu Xinbo 15 days of the "Global Times" reporter said that not follow the government's policy is the US political culture, even the same thing will not use the same language.
Dong Yunchang in expressing this position particularly talked about China. She said that the United States will develop "results-oriented" relations with China, including favoring the interests of the American people and urging China to comply with international norms. "This constructive relationship is based on the common interests of both parties," Dong said, "We hope to engage in constructive discussions with China in order to focus on problematic areas and make progress."
Wu Xinbo told the "Global Times" reporter, Trump government and the Obama administration's attitude towards the Asia-Pacific region has two major differences. First, the diplomatic strategy of the two governments is different. Asia-Pacific issues in the Obama administration's global strategy is more prominent, when Obama tried to reshape the power structure of the Asia-Pacific. But for the Trump government, his main focus will be on the Middle East, such as the fight against "Islamic countries" and so on. In addition, Northeast Asia will be his focus. Second, the concerns of the two governments are different. The Obama administration is very concerned about the leadership and status of the United States. Trump government is more concerned about "doing their own thing" - that is, to strengthen the United States itself. For the time being, the Trump government has not invested too much in the Asia-Pacific region.
Some Western scholars have warned the Trump government that the "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategy is dead. The United States Department of State and the Department of Defense have not yet arranged for the Asia-Pacific policy of the candidates, "policy vacuum" may bring instability factors, the US Defense News Network said. Trump government quickly to Obama's Asia-Pacific policy to make a complete negative expression may have a direct negative effect, so that China has the opportunity to take the initiative in the Asia-Pacific affairs.
In fact, the United States has launched operations in Asia Pacific. On the evening of 15, Secretary of State Tillerson's plane landed at Haneda Airport in Tokyo. "Voice of Germany" commented that Tilleson first visited Asia, aimed at strengthening cooperation with Japan and South Korea to deal with the DPRK nuclear threat. At the same time, it also shows that "the United States preferred" does not mean that the United States diplomatically quit Asia. For the restless allies, or can provide some comfort.
According to Japan's TBS television reported that Tilleson will visit the Japanese Prime Minister Abe on the 16th, and then with the Japanese side of the field Tianxiong talks. The two sides are expected to confirm the strengthening of the Japan-US alliance, as well as the DPRK nuclear issue on Japan and the United States and South Korea the importance of coordination and cooperation. Reuters on the 15th, said Tillerson will discuss with the Japanese side in the country to deploy "Sad" the possibility. The Trump government is revising its policy towards the DPRK and exploring all options, including the use of force.
After the trip to Japan, Tillerson will visit South Korea on the 17th. "Japan and South Korea want to know that the United States will continue to provide defense protection for both countries," he said to the Associated Press, director of the Institute of Contemporary Asian Studies at the Temple University in Tokyo. At the same time, it will show a certain amount in dealing with relations with China and North Korea. The degree of sensitivity and diplomatic skills.
After that, Tillerson will visit China from 18 to 19. The United States, "Washington Post" reported on the 15th, the DPRK nuclear issue has become the first task of the Trump government. Tillerson's trip to Asia will explore and coordinate the strategy of coping with the DPRK nuclear issue. In China, Tillerson will persuade China to use economic forces to contain Pyongyang's missile development program. In addition, his mission in China also includes the dissatisfaction of China with the Trump government. Trump repeatedly claimed that China had stolen jobs in the United States during the campaign and questioned a Chinese policy. Although Trump and his aides later recovered from China's problems, Tillerson would be skeptical to China in the first high-level visit to China, and lay the groundwork for further development of bilateral relations.
"Return to Asia-Pacific" "Asia-Pacific rebalance", these Obama's efforts to promote the strategy has been "officially dead." Local time on the 13th, the US State Department Acting Assistant Secretary of State Susan Thornton (Chinese name Dong Yunchang) announced the news. She said that the Trump government's Asia-Pacific policy will have a new program, but it is not yet formed. Dong Yung-chun made the remarks when US Secretary of State Tillerson opened his first trip to Asia. He arrived in Japan on the 15th and will visit South Korea and China in the following days. The outside world is very concerned about his words and deeds, apparently hope to find a clue about the new US Asia-Pacific policy.
Dong Yunchang is responsible for East Asian affairs in the US Department of State. US Defense News Network reported on the 14th, when talking about the Trump government's Asia-Pacific policy, she told reporters on the 13th, "return to Asia-Pacific, Asia-Pacific rebalancing are all the Obama administration's Asian policy words, you can expect The new government will have its own program. " She said that although the program has not yet seen anything in the details, but it is certain that the Obama administration's "return to Asia-Pacific" strategy has been "officially dead."
That does not mean that the United States will give up Asia. When asked about the future of the strategy, Dong said that the Trump government realized that the Asia-Pacific region had great economic potential and that the United States would increase its participation in Asia-Pacific and continue to live and remain alive in Asia. The United States will promote fair and free trade in Asia, handle security issues in North Korea and other regions, and continue to promote a constructive, rule-based, peaceful and stable Asian order. Fudan University Institute of International Studies executive vice president Wu Xinbo 15 days of the "Global Times" reporter said that not follow the government's policy is the US political culture, even the same thing will not use the same language.
Dong Yunchang in expressing this position particularly talked about China. She said that the United States will develop "results-oriented" relations with China, including favoring the interests of the American people and urging China to comply with international norms. "This constructive relationship is based on the common interests of both parties," Dong said, "We hope to engage in constructive discussions with China in order to focus on problematic areas and make progress."
Wu Xinbo told the "Global Times" reporter, Trump government and the Obama administration's attitude towards the Asia-Pacific region has two major differences. First, the diplomatic strategy of the two governments is different. Asia-Pacific issues in the Obama administration's global strategy is more prominent, when Obama tried to reshape the power structure of the Asia-Pacific. But for the Trump government, his main focus will be on the Middle East, such as the fight against "Islamic countries" and so on. In addition, Northeast Asia will be his focus. Second, the concerns of the two governments are different. The Obama administration is very concerned about the leadership and status of the United States. Trump government is more concerned about "doing their own thing" - that is, to strengthen the United States itself. For the time being, the Trump government has not invested too much in the Asia-Pacific region.
Some Western scholars have warned the Trump government that the "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategy is dead. The United States Department of State and the Department of Defense have not yet arranged for the Asia-Pacific policy of the candidates, "policy vacuum" may bring instability factors, the US Defense News Network said. Trump government quickly to Obama's Asia-Pacific policy to make a complete negative expression may have a direct negative effect, so that China has the opportunity to take the initiative in the Asia-Pacific affairs.
In fact, the United States has launched operations in Asia Pacific. On the evening of 15, Secretary of State Tillerson's plane landed at Haneda Airport in Tokyo. "Voice of Germany" commented that Tilleson first visited Asia, aimed at strengthening cooperation with Japan and South Korea to deal with the DPRK nuclear threat. At the same time, it also shows that "the United States preferred" does not mean that the United States diplomatically quit Asia. For the restless allies, or can provide some comfort.
According to Japan's TBS television reported that Tilleson will visit the Japanese Prime Minister Abe on the 16th, and then with the Japanese side of the field Tianxiong talks. The two sides are expected to confirm the strengthening of the Japan-US alliance, as well as the DPRK nuclear issue on Japan and the United States and South Korea the importance of coordination and cooperation. Reuters on the 15th, said Tillerson will discuss with the Japanese side in the country to deploy "Sad" the possibility. The Trump government is revising its policy towards the DPRK and exploring all options, including the use of force.
After the trip to Japan, Tillerson will visit South Korea on the 17th. "Japan and South Korea want to know that the United States will continue to provide defense protection for both countries," he said to the Associated Press, director of the Institute of Contemporary Asian Studies at the Temple University in Tokyo. At the same time, it will show a certain amount in dealing with relations with China and North Korea. The degree of sensitivity and diplomatic skills.
After that, Tillerson will visit China from 18 to 19. The United States, "Washington Post" reported on the 15th, the DPRK nuclear issue has become the first task of the Trump government. Tillerson's trip to Asia will explore and coordinate the strategy of coping with the DPRK nuclear issue. In China, Tillerson will persuade China to use economic forces to contain Pyongyang's missile development program. In addition, his mission in China also includes the dissatisfaction of China with the Trump government. Trump repeatedly claimed that China had stolen jobs in the United States during the campaign and questioned a Chinese policy. Although Trump and his aides later recovered from China's problems, Tillerson would be skeptical to China in the first high-level visit to China, and lay the groundwork for further development of bilateral relations.
2017年3月14日星期二
China QTS-11 intelligent rifle high-definition map exposure
China QTS-11 intelligent rifle high-definition map exposure
QTS-11-type integrated combat system had been on the network by the military fans called "ZH-05-type strategy rifle." The QTS-11 Integrated Combat System consists of a 5.8 mm assault rifle and a 20-mm grenade launcher, with a full gun length of less than 0.95 m, and the QTS-11 integrated combat system is developed by the China Ordnance Industry's 208th Research Institute. , The weight is less than 5 kg.
QTS-11-type integrated combat system had been on the network by the military fans called "ZH-05-type strategy rifle." The QTS-11 Integrated Combat System consists of a 5.8 mm assault rifle and a 20-mm grenade launcher, with a full gun length of less than 0.95 m, and the QTS-11 integrated combat system is developed by the China Ordnance Industry's 208th Research Institute. , The weight is less than 5 kg.
China plans to deploy new days of radar to monitor Japan and South Korea, F-35B or no longer invisible
China plans to deploy new days of radar to monitor Japan and South Korea, F-35B or no longer invisible
China's media reported on the 13th, has been running to monitor the Korean Peninsula, China's radar, recently deployed to cover the whole territory of Korea and Japan to detect the radius of 3,000 km sky radar. The article said that China is the deployment of South Korea and South Korea "Sade" launched a fierce retaliation, and has been expanding the deployment of detection distance than the "Sade" to long radar.
According to "Chosun Ilbo" reported that China last January in Inner Mongolia, the deployment of super-horizon radar. Ordinary radar waves will penetrate the atmosphere of the ionosphere, and super-horizon radar radio waves (wavelength 10-60 meters) in the altitude of 100-450 km of the ionospheric reflection, it can be along the arc of the Earth's surface, through the horizon Detection of objects beyond 3,000 km. Equivalent to super "Sade" radar several times the super radar.
The article also quoted China's domestic website reported that China's newly deployed radar towards the direction of Tokyo, Japan, in addition to parts of Hokkaido, Japan and the Korean Peninsula are within the detection range. Super-horizon radar radio can also capture the ordinary radar is difficult to detect the stealth aircraft. Some analysts said the United States in Japan Yamaguchi Prefecture rock state aviation base deployment of the latest stealth fighter F-35B will be included in China's surveillance network.
The report also said that this is not China's first deployment of super-horizon radar. The first radar is located in Hubei, Henan, Anhui provinces at the junction. In order to monitor the military movements in Northeast Asia, including the Korean Peninsula, China is still in Shuangyashan, Heilongjiang Province, began to detect the distance of 5500 km of new radar deployment.
For the Korean media reported that China once again deployed Tianbo radar, an unnamed Chinese military experts on the "Global Times" reporter said that this will not comment. However, the foreign media has been for China's equipment sky wave over the horizon radar speculation. In fact, Skywave over-the-horizon radar is not the invention of China, the United States and other countries have long been equipment. Skywave over-the-horizon radar has three major advantages. First, you can carry out super-horizon detection. Because of its special working system, electromagnetic waves through the ionosphere to reflect the downward reflection, almost free from the Earth's curvature, which is particularly useful for the detection of ballistic missiles. For example, the AN / TPY-2 radar, which is deployed at sea level, is to detect a ballistic missile of 2,000 kilometers and must wait until it rises to about 240 kilometers to detect that the sky-wave over-the-horizon radar can take off Can be found. The second is the detection distance, due to the use of long-distance transmission of the rice wave band, and the transmission power is very large, the detection distance can be as far as thousands of kilometers. The third is suitable for detecting stealth targets. Because of its work in the rice wave band, stealth aircraft may resonate with the band of radar waves, leading to its radar target characteristics obvious. However, experts said that the weakness of Skywave over-the-horizon radar is low detection accuracy, must cooperate with other radar to fully play a role. This is not possible with the use of X-band, which can be used to directly guide the missile's AN / TPY-2 radar. In addition, the number of radar equipment, fixed deployment, is not conducive to wartime maneuvers, camouflage and protection.
China's media reported on the 13th, has been running to monitor the Korean Peninsula, China's radar, recently deployed to cover the whole territory of Korea and Japan to detect the radius of 3,000 km sky radar. The article said that China is the deployment of South Korea and South Korea "Sade" launched a fierce retaliation, and has been expanding the deployment of detection distance than the "Sade" to long radar.
According to "Chosun Ilbo" reported that China last January in Inner Mongolia, the deployment of super-horizon radar. Ordinary radar waves will penetrate the atmosphere of the ionosphere, and super-horizon radar radio waves (wavelength 10-60 meters) in the altitude of 100-450 km of the ionospheric reflection, it can be along the arc of the Earth's surface, through the horizon Detection of objects beyond 3,000 km. Equivalent to super "Sade" radar several times the super radar.
The article also quoted China's domestic website reported that China's newly deployed radar towards the direction of Tokyo, Japan, in addition to parts of Hokkaido, Japan and the Korean Peninsula are within the detection range. Super-horizon radar radio can also capture the ordinary radar is difficult to detect the stealth aircraft. Some analysts said the United States in Japan Yamaguchi Prefecture rock state aviation base deployment of the latest stealth fighter F-35B will be included in China's surveillance network.
The report also said that this is not China's first deployment of super-horizon radar. The first radar is located in Hubei, Henan, Anhui provinces at the junction. In order to monitor the military movements in Northeast Asia, including the Korean Peninsula, China is still in Shuangyashan, Heilongjiang Province, began to detect the distance of 5500 km of new radar deployment.
For the Korean media reported that China once again deployed Tianbo radar, an unnamed Chinese military experts on the "Global Times" reporter said that this will not comment. However, the foreign media has been for China's equipment sky wave over the horizon radar speculation. In fact, Skywave over-the-horizon radar is not the invention of China, the United States and other countries have long been equipment. Skywave over-the-horizon radar has three major advantages. First, you can carry out super-horizon detection. Because of its special working system, electromagnetic waves through the ionosphere to reflect the downward reflection, almost free from the Earth's curvature, which is particularly useful for the detection of ballistic missiles. For example, the AN / TPY-2 radar, which is deployed at sea level, is to detect a ballistic missile of 2,000 kilometers and must wait until it rises to about 240 kilometers to detect that the sky-wave over-the-horizon radar can take off Can be found. The second is the detection distance, due to the use of long-distance transmission of the rice wave band, and the transmission power is very large, the detection distance can be as far as thousands of kilometers. The third is suitable for detecting stealth targets. Because of its work in the rice wave band, stealth aircraft may resonate with the band of radar waves, leading to its radar target characteristics obvious. However, experts said that the weakness of Skywave over-the-horizon radar is low detection accuracy, must cooperate with other radar to fully play a role. This is not possible with the use of X-band, which can be used to directly guide the missile's AN / TPY-2 radar. In addition, the number of radar equipment, fixed deployment, is not conducive to wartime maneuvers, camouflage and protection.
订阅：
博文 (Atom)