China this weapon in the history of the largest orders! 300 hurricane $ 2.4 billion
The picture shows the Saudi pendant of the Chinese pterosaurs
Recently, according to the Pakistani Defense News Network published an article that Saudi Arabia to 8 million US dollars unit price, to China to buy 300 pterosaurs UAV, and put into practical application. Therefore, some analysts said that there is no doubt that the pterosaurs unmanned aerial vehicles exported to Saudi Arabia, China created unmanned warplanes in the history of the largest orders, which fully shows that China's UAV has been recognized by the international arms market.
From the information already available to know, pterosaur UAV with large aspect ratio in the wing, V-tail design, length 9.3 meters, 2.8 meters high, wingspan 14 meters, the tail of the fuselage with a piston Engine, the maximum takeoff weight of 1200 kg, the maximum flight height of 5300 meters, the maximum flight speed of 280 km / h, the maximum battery life of 20 hours, the maximum range of 4000 km, can mount more than 8 km range AR-1 anti-tank missiles arms.
In the field of military unmanned aerial vehicles, previously the United States and Israel evenly divided, and in the field of large-scale strategic unmanned aerial vehicles, the US global eagle is almost thriving. Europe and Russia from this gap are still quite large. The Chinese unmanned aerial vehicles, from the imitation of the former Soviet Union unmanned drone and the United States unmanned reconnaissance aircraft began, after decades of development, has entered the World UAV first phalanx. Especially in the past decade, the development of China's UAV has been blowout trend.
At present, China's aviation industry system, aerospace science and technology system, aerospace science and technology system, weapons industry systems have launched their own products, including the largest amount of equipment and exports is to check one medium-sized unmanned aerial vehicles. Pterosaurs are a long-haul, low-altitude, multi-purpose unmanned combat aircraft developed by AVIC. In addition to the tasks of ground attack, investigation and surveillance, they can also perform boundary patrol, disaster monitoring, geological exploration and other tasks The
Saudi Arabia as one of the world's leading oil-producing countries, with a large number of oil dollars, in terms of foreign military procurement, it has always been generous. So that the news, with a certain degree of credibility. And 300 pterosaurs unmanned aerial vehicles, the price of $ 2.4 billion, and if the same type from the United States to import the same number of predators hit unmanned aerial vehicles, the total price to more than 7 billion US dollars. The Chinese pterosaurs unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as rainbow series UAV, its performance is not inferior to the US products, with better price.
Compared to the manned aircraft, China's series of unmanned aerial vehicles in recent years, the export volume is greater, the amount of higher, more importing countries. At present, China is developing a number of models of large unmanned aerial vehicles, its performance will be almost equal to the US global eagle. The global Hawk is only the most intimate ally of the United States supply, most countries are unsuccessful, and this is the Chinese UAV, especially large unmanned aircraft exports a good opportunity.
2017年3月20日星期一
President Philippine: Declaring War on China
President Philippine: Declaring War on China
A Chinese in Huangyan Island to build environmental monitoring station news, these two days suddenly foreign media stir fry. The media said it would be China's first permanent building built on the island reefs with sovereignty over the Philippines, and Beijing seems to have shown a tough stance on the South China Sea issue. In the Western media to stir up the fire, the Philippines was add oil and vinegar, will be rendered as "the Chinese side announced the prelude to air defense identification area." "Do you want me to do anything? Declare war on China? I can not." Philippine President Duttertt 19 in response to the matter criticized that the complaint against China is in the "finding fault." In fact, with the Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang officially visited the Philippines, the development of bilateral relations is entering the fast lane. Philippe Minister of Tourism Taiao commented on the visit, "We are witnessing President Duther's policy on China's flowering results."
Philippine "Manila Times" reported on the 19th, Philippine Presidential Office spokesman Abe on the 18th through mobile phone text messages to tell the newspaper, they have made inquiries to the Chinese authorities to understand the authenticity of the report on the Huangyan Island Environmental Monitoring Station. Earlier, the Chinese media quoted local officials as saying that the Chinese side will continue to promote this year in the sand and other rock reef island environmental monitoring station early work. Philippine "Star" said the Philippine intelligence department confirmed that China is building a foundation for the construction of Huangyan Island, looks like a monitoring station.
British Broadcasting Corporation commented that China plans to build the first permanent building on Huangyan Island, it seems that China reaffirmed in the South China Sea to defend the "national core interests" determination. The United States warned Beijing not to carry out reclamation activities, but China has been filled with the expansion of the South China Sea several other island reefs. Reuters quoted the US expert on the issue of Asian experts, as far as the case, it is unclear whether China plans to dig in the Huangyan Island project. A spokesman for the US State Department said in response to the incident, has noted that China's related reports, called on the South China Sea cable country to avoid the construction of the disputed island reefs. Previously, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said, "China in Huangyan Island to do what, do not do anything, are within the scope of China's sovereignty."
In the Western media on the matter after some speculation, the Philippines began to sound some people to speak. "The South China Sea Arbitration case," an important member of the Philippine legal team, the Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio on the 18th warned that "once China in Huangyan Island built environmental monitoring," the Philippine Daily News reported on the 19th, Station, will be able to monitor the entire South China Sea through the radar station, the next step is probably to announce the air defense identification area. Philippine "Manila Standard News" quoted the original Philippine Permanent Representative to the United Nations, said Bacha, the government should be the strongest way against China in Huangyan Island, the construction of monitoring stations. He said that if China's construction of the monitoring station, and China will step by step "occupation" Meiji reef similar to the situation, "now they have been there to build a fortifications." Philippine "Star" commented that Dutterter may have a misjudgment of Philippine-Chinese relations, he needs to stop to rethink.
"We can not stop China to do these things, the United States can not do what you want me to do? Declared war on China (do so) we will lose all the troops and the police tomorrow, the country will be eliminated." British Broadcasting Corporation 19 Reported that the day was a reporter asked the matter, Dutterter told the outside world, declared war to the powerful China is no different from the fire burned. He said he would tell China to "keep the waters open and do not interfere with the Philippine Coast Guard." AFP said that Duttert also left the outside world on the Chinese scientific expedition ship into the "Bingham uplift" waters of the concerns aside, "they stopped there and what?" He described the complaint against China is "finding fault."
On the 19th, Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang ended his official visit to the Philippines. 18, held in Manila, China-Philippine Economic and Trade Cooperation Forum and SME Investment and Trade Fair, he said in his keynote speech, thanks to improved relations between the two countries, since last October Philippine agricultural exports to China, , Pineapple, banana and mango exports increased by 200%, 100%, 50% and 30% respectively. In 2016, Chinese companies increased their investment in Philippine 47%, the Philippine business investment in China grew faster, two-way investment stock close to 5 billion US dollars. A batch of projects is expected to start recently. At present, the flight between the two countries has reached 159 classes per week, the future is expected to further increase.
10 days ago, Dutterter met with the Chinese government economic and trade delegation, said, "Philippine-Chinese relations are embracing the spring, after all, we have experienced so long winter." Wang Yang in the 18th speech mentioned in this passage, and said, "Chinese people believe that Chunhua Qiushi, which means that in the spring sowing seeds, from the harvest will not be too far."
CNN Philippine Channel commented on the 19th, although the South China Sea issue during the Chinese vice-chancellor visit the Philippines as a media focus, but this did not prevent the two countries during the visit to strengthen economic relations. Philippine Ministry of Trade and Industry said that China is expected to become the Philippines this year, the largest trading partner. "The Manila Times" said that because of China, Dutterter can confidently say that he is far from outside criticism, only the execution of drug traffickers. Philippine-Chinese relations seem to have entered the golden period. Philippine Tourism Minister Theo said: "The door to economic and personnel exchanges is greatly open and the relationship between the two countries has entered a new page."
A Chinese in Huangyan Island to build environmental monitoring station news, these two days suddenly foreign media stir fry. The media said it would be China's first permanent building built on the island reefs with sovereignty over the Philippines, and Beijing seems to have shown a tough stance on the South China Sea issue. In the Western media to stir up the fire, the Philippines was add oil and vinegar, will be rendered as "the Chinese side announced the prelude to air defense identification area." "Do you want me to do anything? Declare war on China? I can not." Philippine President Duttertt 19 in response to the matter criticized that the complaint against China is in the "finding fault." In fact, with the Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang officially visited the Philippines, the development of bilateral relations is entering the fast lane. Philippe Minister of Tourism Taiao commented on the visit, "We are witnessing President Duther's policy on China's flowering results."
Philippine "Manila Times" reported on the 19th, Philippine Presidential Office spokesman Abe on the 18th through mobile phone text messages to tell the newspaper, they have made inquiries to the Chinese authorities to understand the authenticity of the report on the Huangyan Island Environmental Monitoring Station. Earlier, the Chinese media quoted local officials as saying that the Chinese side will continue to promote this year in the sand and other rock reef island environmental monitoring station early work. Philippine "Star" said the Philippine intelligence department confirmed that China is building a foundation for the construction of Huangyan Island, looks like a monitoring station.
British Broadcasting Corporation commented that China plans to build the first permanent building on Huangyan Island, it seems that China reaffirmed in the South China Sea to defend the "national core interests" determination. The United States warned Beijing not to carry out reclamation activities, but China has been filled with the expansion of the South China Sea several other island reefs. Reuters quoted the US expert on the issue of Asian experts, as far as the case, it is unclear whether China plans to dig in the Huangyan Island project. A spokesman for the US State Department said in response to the incident, has noted that China's related reports, called on the South China Sea cable country to avoid the construction of the disputed island reefs. Previously, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said, "China in Huangyan Island to do what, do not do anything, are within the scope of China's sovereignty."
In the Western media on the matter after some speculation, the Philippines began to sound some people to speak. "The South China Sea Arbitration case," an important member of the Philippine legal team, the Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio on the 18th warned that "once China in Huangyan Island built environmental monitoring," the Philippine Daily News reported on the 19th, Station, will be able to monitor the entire South China Sea through the radar station, the next step is probably to announce the air defense identification area. Philippine "Manila Standard News" quoted the original Philippine Permanent Representative to the United Nations, said Bacha, the government should be the strongest way against China in Huangyan Island, the construction of monitoring stations. He said that if China's construction of the monitoring station, and China will step by step "occupation" Meiji reef similar to the situation, "now they have been there to build a fortifications." Philippine "Star" commented that Dutterter may have a misjudgment of Philippine-Chinese relations, he needs to stop to rethink.
"We can not stop China to do these things, the United States can not do what you want me to do? Declared war on China (do so) we will lose all the troops and the police tomorrow, the country will be eliminated." British Broadcasting Corporation 19 Reported that the day was a reporter asked the matter, Dutterter told the outside world, declared war to the powerful China is no different from the fire burned. He said he would tell China to "keep the waters open and do not interfere with the Philippine Coast Guard." AFP said that Duttert also left the outside world on the Chinese scientific expedition ship into the "Bingham uplift" waters of the concerns aside, "they stopped there and what?" He described the complaint against China is "finding fault."
On the 19th, Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang ended his official visit to the Philippines. 18, held in Manila, China-Philippine Economic and Trade Cooperation Forum and SME Investment and Trade Fair, he said in his keynote speech, thanks to improved relations between the two countries, since last October Philippine agricultural exports to China, , Pineapple, banana and mango exports increased by 200%, 100%, 50% and 30% respectively. In 2016, Chinese companies increased their investment in Philippine 47%, the Philippine business investment in China grew faster, two-way investment stock close to 5 billion US dollars. A batch of projects is expected to start recently. At present, the flight between the two countries has reached 159 classes per week, the future is expected to further increase.
10 days ago, Dutterter met with the Chinese government economic and trade delegation, said, "Philippine-Chinese relations are embracing the spring, after all, we have experienced so long winter." Wang Yang in the 18th speech mentioned in this passage, and said, "Chinese people believe that Chunhua Qiushi, which means that in the spring sowing seeds, from the harvest will not be too far."
CNN Philippine Channel commented on the 19th, although the South China Sea issue during the Chinese vice-chancellor visit the Philippines as a media focus, but this did not prevent the two countries during the visit to strengthen economic relations. Philippine Ministry of Trade and Industry said that China is expected to become the Philippines this year, the largest trading partner. "The Manila Times" said that because of China, Dutterter can confidently say that he is far from outside criticism, only the execution of drug traffickers. Philippine-Chinese relations seem to have entered the golden period. Philippine Tourism Minister Theo said: "The door to economic and personnel exchanges is greatly open and the relationship between the two countries has entered a new page."
2017年3月16日星期四
Langkawi air show is about to carry out, the main fighter gathered in Malaysia
Langkawi air show is about to carry out, the main fighter gathered in Malaysia
(LIMA 2017) will open in 2017, the current layout has been basically completed, including F-16, Su-30MKI, MiG -29, MiG -21, m -171, m-24, P -8A, India LCA fighters, India LCH armed helicopters, France Mirage 2000 and gusts fighters, Sweden, "Gripen" fighters, Jaguar attack aircraft and many other equipment has gathered in the exhibition area.
(LIMA 2017) will open in 2017, the current layout has been basically completed, including F-16, Su-30MKI, MiG -29, MiG -21, m -171, m-24, P -8A, India LCA fighters, India LCH armed helicopters, France Mirage 2000 and gusts fighters, Sweden, "Gripen" fighters, Jaguar attack aircraft and many other equipment has gathered in the exhibition area.
If the US policy toward the DPRK is wrong, do not be wrong
If the US policy toward the DPRK is wrong, do not be wrong
US Secretary of State Tillerson's trip to East Asia has attracted public attention to the situation on the Korean Peninsula. He said in Tokyo that the United States over the past 20 years, the DPRK policy is a failure, need to adjust. Tillerson also called China "the main source of economic and political support in the DPRK" and believes that China can play an extremely important role. US and Japanese opinion have speculated that Tillerson will ask China to strengthen sanctions for North Korea "do more."
Peninsula, the situation is tight, North Korea refused to unilaterally suspend nuclear activities, the United States and South Korea did not have a new approach to complain that China's pressure on the DPRK pressure, which has become a very solid thinking. The New York Times quoted an anonymous US official as saying that if China did not help to constrain North Korea's nuclear program, the United States was ready to strengthen missile defense and further pressure on Chinese financial institutions.
CNN reports that the United States is prepared to impose fines on Chinese companies and banks that do business with North Korea.
It must be said that in the current situation, this is still a "evil first complain" tactics. "Sade" into Korea by China's severe opposition, Beijing's position will not change. Even if the Chinese side to persuade the United States, but Beijing has the ability to severely punish South Korea, which will make Washington embarrassing.
China is still on the DPRK "water", China's banks and various enterprises continue to maintain a lot of cooperation with the DPRK, which is entirely the United States of course. If the new diplomatic team of the United States sets a new policy toward the DPRK based on this misjudgment, they will only make more serious mistakes than in the past 20 years.
A basic fact is that China's opposition to the true attitude of the DPRK nuclear issue is not hesitant than the United States and South Korea. China's proximity to the peninsula, nuclear weapons in the peninsula of the test, the deployment of China's security constitutes a potentially long-term risk, as long as a way to promote Pyongyang to abandon nuclear, China has no reason not to try.
Beijing has announced that it will not import North Korea before the end of this year, which will seriously affect Pyongyang's foreign exchange sources. Beijing also announced a more stringent ban on exports to the list of goods, and nuclear research related to the development of goods, now never expect one from China into the Yalu River on the other side.
However, if the United States and South Korea asked China to "shut down" the border between China and the DPRK, it was necessary to punish all the Korean people, while the current political power of Pyongyang to death, not just to deal with North Korea nuclear activities. On this point, Beijing must not give in.
In that case, the United States and South Korea is tantamount to the entire North Korean nuclear issue outsourced to China, China has become the United States and South Korea to the DPRK strategy new full join. China and North Korea will become the "enemy", the Sino-Korean opposition will become the new main contradiction in Northeast Asia. The DPRK nuclear issue is caused by the US-DPRK opposition, and now let China help the United States and South Korea "wiping ass", carry all the responsibility, once the DPRK chaos, China has become the first wave was affected, sorry, the United States and South Korea did not ask China s right.
Also, North Korea has been extremely isolated, it is isolated in the moment the world is unique. However, Pyongyang did not yield, even if there is no one with it from China, will it yield to it? Ask Washington to remember, which history has ever been used to overwhelm the regime which regime?
In the final analysis, or the United States and South Korea's strategy is too lack of flexibility, and would rather adhere to the wrong approach, do not want to carry out new attempts. Tilleson said that the past 20 years of the US policy toward the DPRK are wrong, then that 20 years the United States toward the policy of the main tone of what is it? Are sanctions and threats, not anything else. If only in the degree of sanctions and threats on the code, as if the towel in the hard to twist the last drop of water, which is correct mistakes?
China has never been involved in the DPRK sanctions, to participate in the development and resolute implementation of the sanctions against the DPRK, our changes in the span and the United States and South Korea to change the span of who is greater, is not it clear! Washington even "double suspension" "double track" Are willing to do, its policy toward the degree of rigidity too disappointing.
The United States and South Korea are clearly not on the DPRK nuclear issue "absolutely right" side, even from a strategic point of view, "double suspension" and "double track" is also worth a try. The United States and South Korea are afraid of North Korea "lost majesty" it? They are so much power, but also need to "majestic" always end it? Think of reflection and reflection.
US Secretary of State Tillerson's trip to East Asia has attracted public attention to the situation on the Korean Peninsula. He said in Tokyo that the United States over the past 20 years, the DPRK policy is a failure, need to adjust. Tillerson also called China "the main source of economic and political support in the DPRK" and believes that China can play an extremely important role. US and Japanese opinion have speculated that Tillerson will ask China to strengthen sanctions for North Korea "do more."
Peninsula, the situation is tight, North Korea refused to unilaterally suspend nuclear activities, the United States and South Korea did not have a new approach to complain that China's pressure on the DPRK pressure, which has become a very solid thinking. The New York Times quoted an anonymous US official as saying that if China did not help to constrain North Korea's nuclear program, the United States was ready to strengthen missile defense and further pressure on Chinese financial institutions.
CNN reports that the United States is prepared to impose fines on Chinese companies and banks that do business with North Korea.
It must be said that in the current situation, this is still a "evil first complain" tactics. "Sade" into Korea by China's severe opposition, Beijing's position will not change. Even if the Chinese side to persuade the United States, but Beijing has the ability to severely punish South Korea, which will make Washington embarrassing.
China is still on the DPRK "water", China's banks and various enterprises continue to maintain a lot of cooperation with the DPRK, which is entirely the United States of course. If the new diplomatic team of the United States sets a new policy toward the DPRK based on this misjudgment, they will only make more serious mistakes than in the past 20 years.
A basic fact is that China's opposition to the true attitude of the DPRK nuclear issue is not hesitant than the United States and South Korea. China's proximity to the peninsula, nuclear weapons in the peninsula of the test, the deployment of China's security constitutes a potentially long-term risk, as long as a way to promote Pyongyang to abandon nuclear, China has no reason not to try.
Beijing has announced that it will not import North Korea before the end of this year, which will seriously affect Pyongyang's foreign exchange sources. Beijing also announced a more stringent ban on exports to the list of goods, and nuclear research related to the development of goods, now never expect one from China into the Yalu River on the other side.
However, if the United States and South Korea asked China to "shut down" the border between China and the DPRK, it was necessary to punish all the Korean people, while the current political power of Pyongyang to death, not just to deal with North Korea nuclear activities. On this point, Beijing must not give in.
In that case, the United States and South Korea is tantamount to the entire North Korean nuclear issue outsourced to China, China has become the United States and South Korea to the DPRK strategy new full join. China and North Korea will become the "enemy", the Sino-Korean opposition will become the new main contradiction in Northeast Asia. The DPRK nuclear issue is caused by the US-DPRK opposition, and now let China help the United States and South Korea "wiping ass", carry all the responsibility, once the DPRK chaos, China has become the first wave was affected, sorry, the United States and South Korea did not ask China s right.
Also, North Korea has been extremely isolated, it is isolated in the moment the world is unique. However, Pyongyang did not yield, even if there is no one with it from China, will it yield to it? Ask Washington to remember, which history has ever been used to overwhelm the regime which regime?
In the final analysis, or the United States and South Korea's strategy is too lack of flexibility, and would rather adhere to the wrong approach, do not want to carry out new attempts. Tilleson said that the past 20 years of the US policy toward the DPRK are wrong, then that 20 years the United States toward the policy of the main tone of what is it? Are sanctions and threats, not anything else. If only in the degree of sanctions and threats on the code, as if the towel in the hard to twist the last drop of water, which is correct mistakes?
China has never been involved in the DPRK sanctions, to participate in the development and resolute implementation of the sanctions against the DPRK, our changes in the span and the United States and South Korea to change the span of who is greater, is not it clear! Washington even "double suspension" "double track" Are willing to do, its policy toward the degree of rigidity too disappointing.
The United States and South Korea are clearly not on the DPRK nuclear issue "absolutely right" side, even from a strategic point of view, "double suspension" and "double track" is also worth a try. The United States and South Korea are afraid of North Korea "lost majesty" it? They are so much power, but also need to "majestic" always end it? Think of reflection and reflection.
China cruise group refused to South Korea port, 360,000 tourists lost
China cruise group refused to South Korea port, 360,000 tourists lost
In the context of the continuing deterioration of China-ROK relations, many cruise companies operating in China have decided to cancel the Korean port stop plan, change the route. South Korea related industries forecast, the Chinese cruise group to cancel the phenomenon of Korean docking at least until the end of June this year.
According to the Yonhap news agency reported on March 16, the relevant industry news that the number of cruise companies operating in China recently announced that it will stop at the port of Korea from March 15 to the end of June. This measure led to the departure of China from 182 flights by South Korea, a total of 360,000 visitors to South Korea tour.
Industry analysts said that the Chinese cruise company, the best-selling cruise products in Northeast Asia, including South Korea routes, so they will not give up completely. They decided to suspend by the end of June through the South Korean port, which means that if the situation changes, then return to South Korea route.
On the other hand, Chinese tourists traveling to Korea have suffered a sharp decline, and many airlines have reduced or suspended flights from China to South Korea. China Eastern Airlines from 15 to suspend Ningbo to South Korea Qingzhou flights, Spring Airlines canceled March 16 to 26 Ningbo to Jeju flights. Korean Air to reduce the March 16 to April 23 South Korea to China eight route flights, Asiana Airlines also reduced March 15 to April 30 South Korea to China's 12 route flights.
An airline official said the company would inevitably reduce the number of flights due to a significant reduction in the number of visitors using South Korea to China. In view of the increased demand for flights from South Korea to Southeast Asia, the company is considering increasing the number of flights concerned and will actively respond to changes in demand for flights from South Korea to China.
In the context of the continuing deterioration of China-ROK relations, many cruise companies operating in China have decided to cancel the Korean port stop plan, change the route. South Korea related industries forecast, the Chinese cruise group to cancel the phenomenon of Korean docking at least until the end of June this year.
According to the Yonhap news agency reported on March 16, the relevant industry news that the number of cruise companies operating in China recently announced that it will stop at the port of Korea from March 15 to the end of June. This measure led to the departure of China from 182 flights by South Korea, a total of 360,000 visitors to South Korea tour.
Industry analysts said that the Chinese cruise company, the best-selling cruise products in Northeast Asia, including South Korea routes, so they will not give up completely. They decided to suspend by the end of June through the South Korean port, which means that if the situation changes, then return to South Korea route.
On the other hand, Chinese tourists traveling to Korea have suffered a sharp decline, and many airlines have reduced or suspended flights from China to South Korea. China Eastern Airlines from 15 to suspend Ningbo to South Korea Qingzhou flights, Spring Airlines canceled March 16 to 26 Ningbo to Jeju flights. Korean Air to reduce the March 16 to April 23 South Korea to China eight route flights, Asiana Airlines also reduced March 15 to April 30 South Korea to China's 12 route flights.
An airline official said the company would inevitably reduce the number of flights due to a significant reduction in the number of visitors using South Korea to China. In view of the increased demand for flights from South Korea to Southeast Asia, the company is considering increasing the number of flights concerned and will actively respond to changes in demand for flights from South Korea to China.
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
The Iraqi government armed forces have also begun to use commercial unmanned aerial vehicles on the battlefield. Extreme organization "Islamic country" (IS) said in a video released on the 8th of this month that they shot down three Iraqi government police forces to control the Xinjiang (DJI) UAV latitude and longitude M100. A bomb mounted with a badminton as a stabilizer at the rear is mounted on a UFO pan / tilt and controlled by a simple remote control. It is reported that the latitude and longitude M100 is a civilian professional four-axis unmanned aerial vehicles, expensive price.
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
IS on display by their shot down IFP-based DJI UAV, can be seen from the photo, the Iraqi police do UAV bombs than do a lot of intentions to do.
In January of this year, IS's militants used a new tactic in Mosul, using a civilian DJI unmanned aerial vehicle to throw grenade-sized explosives, which the observer had reported. IS is the cheapest "wizard" series of four-axis unmanned aerial vehicles in the DJI product line. The basic version is priced at $ 249 in the United States. The bombs are mostly grenades or grenades, and there are more simple explosives The
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
In January, the Iraqi government forces showed that they were shot down with the explosive hijacking device IS UAV, you can see compared to IFP used, IS modified DJI obviously more humble.
In the face of this situation, while the efforts to shoot down the IS UAV at the same time, the Iraqi Federal Police (IFP) began to "teeth", also use DJI's UAV to throw bombs. However, compared to IS using the cheapest "wizard", IFP is selected DJI product line in the professional level of four-axis unmanned aerial vehicles: latitude and longitude M100, the UAV in the United States based on the price of $ 3299, and the price Almost no accessories, to install the function need another money. Only to the basic price to calculate, M100 and "Wizard" UAV price gap of 13 times.
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
DJI official website on the introduction of the latitude and longitude M100, which is a professional-oriented civilian four-axis unmanned aerial vehicle platform, expensive, the domestic base price of 19999 yuan.
IFP also announced a combat video, heavily armed police forces in the western city of Mosul to clean up IS remnants. In the video, the police used a commercial unmanned aerial vehicle to throw a bomb, and saw the tail of the bomb with a plastic tube lengthened and fitted with a badminton to ensure the stability of the bomb, and the bomb itself seemed to be a 30mm grenade.
In a later release of a longer video, IFP's armed men loaded the bomb onto the M100 and then controlled the UAV with a ground control station, and the UAV finally produced a few meters of error when dropping the bomb.
IFP said that the use of this tactic to avoid civilian casualties and infrastructure damage. IS said that they shot down the IFP UAV is very easy, they have shot down three M100. But in January, the Iraqi government forces also said that shot down as many as a dozen IS commercial UAVs.
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
The devastated city of Mosul.
According to Reuters reported on March 16, the current Iraqi government armed forces are still in Mosul cleared IS residual forces, most of the city has been under the control of government forces.
Note: DJI Nagano UAV is currently popular in the world of civil multi-axis unmanned aerial vehicles, from China's Shenzhen, Xinjiang production technology companies, mainly for civilian aerial photography and other uses, handling distance of 1 km to 7 km range. Such unmanned aerial vehicles in the market can be open to buy, the government and enterprises have no way to limit the flow of products.
The Iraqi government armed forces have also begun to use commercial unmanned aerial vehicles on the battlefield. Extreme organization "Islamic country" (IS) said in a video released on the 8th of this month that they shot down three Iraqi government police forces to control the Xinjiang (DJI) UAV latitude and longitude M100. A bomb mounted with a badminton as a stabilizer at the rear is mounted on a UFO pan / tilt and controlled by a simple remote control. It is reported that the latitude and longitude M100 is a civilian professional four-axis unmanned aerial vehicles, expensive price.
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
IS on display by their shot down IFP-based DJI UAV, can be seen from the photo, the Iraqi police do UAV bombs than do a lot of intentions to do.
In January of this year, IS's militants used a new tactic in Mosul, using a civilian DJI unmanned aerial vehicle to throw grenade-sized explosives, which the observer had reported. IS is the cheapest "wizard" series of four-axis unmanned aerial vehicles in the DJI product line. The basic version is priced at $ 249 in the United States. The bombs are mostly grenades or grenades, and there are more simple explosives The
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
In January, the Iraqi government forces showed that they were shot down with the explosive hijacking device IS UAV, you can see compared to IFP used, IS modified DJI obviously more humble.
In the face of this situation, while the efforts to shoot down the IS UAV at the same time, the Iraqi Federal Police (IFP) began to "teeth", also use DJI's UAV to throw bombs. However, compared to IS using the cheapest "wizard", IFP is selected DJI product line in the professional level of four-axis unmanned aerial vehicles: latitude and longitude M100, the UAV in the United States based on the price of $ 3299, and the price Almost no accessories, to install the function need another money. Only to the basic price to calculate, M100 and "Wizard" UAV price gap of 13 times.
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
DJI official website on the introduction of the latitude and longitude M100, which is a professional-oriented civilian four-axis unmanned aerial vehicle platform, expensive, the domestic base price of 19999 yuan.
IFP also announced a combat video, heavily armed police forces in the western city of Mosul to clean up IS remnants. In the video, the police used a commercial unmanned aerial vehicle to throw a bomb, and saw the tail of the bomb with a plastic tube lengthened and fitted with a badminton to ensure the stability of the bomb, and the bomb itself seemed to be a 30mm grenade.
In a later release of a longer video, IFP's armed men loaded the bomb onto the M100 and then controlled the UAV with a ground control station, and the UAV finally produced a few meters of error when dropping the bomb.
IFP said that the use of this tactic to avoid civilian casualties and infrastructure damage. IS said that they shot down the IFP UAV is very easy, they have shot down three M100. But in January, the Iraqi government forces also said that shot down as many as a dozen IS commercial UAVs.
The Iraqi government uses the Chinese UAV to throw gun grenades into IS
The devastated city of Mosul.
According to Reuters reported on March 16, the current Iraqi government armed forces are still in Mosul cleared IS residual forces, most of the city has been under the control of government forces.
Note: DJI Nagano UAV is currently popular in the world of civil multi-axis unmanned aerial vehicles, from China's Shenzhen, Xinjiang production technology companies, mainly for civilian aerial photography and other uses, handling distance of 1 km to 7 km range. Such unmanned aerial vehicles in the market can be open to buy, the government and enterprises have no way to limit the flow of products.
How did Russia see the 1917 revolution?
How did Russia see the 1917 revolution?
100 years later, Russia how to see the 1917 revolution
[The Global Times Comprehensive Report] Editor's note: "the end of hundreds of years of monarchy, the establishment of the Soviet regime, irreversibly changed the history", the law and society with this sentence summed up the Russian 1917 years. This year, Russia has erupted the February Revolution, the October Revolution, for the strong Soviet era kicked off. In 2017, this revolutionary era ushered in the 100th anniversary, for its interpretation of Russian public opinion in the constant response. Russia, which has experienced the disintegration of the Soviet Union, is now more complex in its 1917 revolution: some argue that it has brought the best of times in the country; it has been said that the process of national development has been hampered. Russian President Vladimir Putin is in charge of the Russian society around the revolution for frank and in-depth evaluation, "will not allow the past split, resentment, resentment and cold pull into our present life."
1. 500 commemorative activities, but to avoid politicization
"In Russia, March 12 is usually considered the starting point of the revolution." Long-term focus on Russia moving to the United States, "New York Times", as if to explore the "abnormal" political signal generally said, "100 years after the March 12 Not the national holidays, the Russian government did not publish similar to commemorate the victory of World War II, said it is 'great victory' official statement.
March 12, 1917, the tsarist system collapsed; the same year on November 7, the October Revolution victory, the establishment of the Soviet regime. Two revolution for the Soviet era laid the foundation for the history of Russia is a heavy color. However, in the Western media view, 100 years after the Russian people do not seem to know how to look at the revolutionary years of 1917, how to commemorate the issue of some "tangled." At the same time, some commemorative activities "cautious", as low as possible. According to the Russian "Opinion" reported that the Russian government did not organize activities during the February Revolution Memorial Day, the media did not carry out a large number of reports, but some areas held a small commemorative activities.
Travel Association "World Without Borders" staff told the "Global Times" reporter, many Chinese tourists with Soviet complex look forward to the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution to catch up with large-scale celebrations, but commemorative activities more concentrated in the history of the world, Russia There is no plan to hold large festivals.
In December last year, the Russian History Society established a committee dedicated to the plan for the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution, based on President Putin's order. President of the Russian Presidential Administration's Social Project Management Department,
Zenikovic said the commemoration would be commemorated in the historical context, and he called for not politicizing it. Agence France-Presse said that Russia is currently preparing to host 500 meetings, round tables, exhibitions and arts festivals to commemorate 1917. The President of the Moscow International Institute of International Relations Anatoly Torkunov was appointed head of the Commission's official commissions, composed of filmmakers, journalists and religious leaders. Torkukov said that the committee was not governed by the Kremlin.
British Art News website said that because the Russian society in 1917 two revolutions and the Soviet Union there is a contradictory mentality, so the Russian museum in the relevant exhibition will take as far as possible without controversy. "If a museum has a collection of 1917-related collections, works of art, etc., it is possible to choose to hold a collection-related exhibition," said historian and curator Anatoly Gruber Weissky. The St. Petersburg Alminas Museum takes the initiative to focus on the exhibition of tsars and their families. The museum's exhibition in the Netherlands will return to St. Petersburg later this year. This exhibition will showcase the "Tsar's Choice and Decide How to Make the Revolution Unusual". The museum director of the Russian National Museum in St. Petersburg said the museum will host a "exhibition of people's lives and art" about historical events.
It is said that the Russian National Museum of History in Red Square in Moscow will also organize exhibitions. "We have to face everything that happened at the time and what happened: this is our common history, and we must be brave to say that we must not forget the remarkable achievements and victories that we have achieved," said the museum curator.
Agence France-Presse said that the Russian government would like to take low-key to celebrate the spirit of dilapidating the revolution in 1917, "warned not to riots." However, at the meeting of the Research Memorial Program Committee, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Agency, Narezkin, made a different interpretation - the 100th anniversary event was designed to commemorate and understand, not to celebrate, Break the people. "For some people, the 1917 revolution was the death of the 'big Russia', 'off Europe', so that we stopped the development in Europe." Russian Presidential Cultural Affairs Special Representative Mikhail Shivideco "For many other people, the Soviet era is the best of their lives," he said. He said that Putin is committed to unite the whole country, "any national level of celebration will exacerbate these differences."
2. "Two distinct views on the collision"
"Differentiation", which is concerned about the Russian society for the October Revolution leader Lenin, 1917 revolution and its follow-up views, the highest frequency of a word.
Agence France-Presse said that for the 1917 revolution, the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 was an important turning point, "the public is increasingly no longer regarded as a victory of these revolutions, but triggered several generations of Russians into the tragedy of suffering." "The disappearance of the monarchy has caused the country to be in anarchy and later into a civil war, and millions of people have lost their lives," said Peter Arkopov, editor-in-chief of the Russian political journal. Russian history professor Vladimir Lavrov said the revolution "led to the collapse of the Millennium empire."
A poll conducted by the Russian "New Area" website on the eve of the October 2016 Revolution Day shows that 28.95% of respondents believe that this is one of the most important events of the 20th century. 23.16% of people said that the November 7 revolution to promote the national development. 24.65% of the respondents said that this is a disaster for Russia, is the beginning of the end of the great nation. Another survey of the Levada Center shows that 21% of respondents believe that the monarchy is the end of the Russian disaster, 13% of people hold a positive view. For Lenin, 40% of the Russian people view positive, 20% of the respondents negative attitude.
65-year-old Moscow citizen Yulia has a deep affection for the Soviet Union. She told the "Global Times" reporter said that it was the October Revolution, the Soviet Union was able to build, she was attached to the Soviet Union during the social progress and national strong. In her view, "Lenin is a hero."
Lenin was very diligent, working 16 hours a day, with a great deal of philosophy and political work, and he commanded the revolution in less than a year and then introduced new economic policies and rebuilt the country in five years. The economy soon returned to pre-war levels, and he was a great leader. "45-year-old Anton thought Lenin was a genius.
And the 36-year-old photographer, Yevgeny, had a different view. "The organizers of the October Revolution had a good will to resist the exploitation of capitalists and let the masses of workers and peasants be the masters, but the revolution opened the brutal civil war."
For the October Revolution, there were young people who were not interested. Natasha, a 98-year-old journalist in Moscow, told the Global Times reporter that the time has elapsed for a long time ... Russia's economy is now poor and housing and other expenses are high. Think of that old age.
"Over the past two decades, there have been two distinct views on the October Revolution, which has been in the public eye, and the academic community has collided with it." Director of the Russian Center for Scientific Thought and Political Ideology, "Global Times" reporter said that after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the liberals away from the Soviet ideology, emphasizing the new concept, and began to appear in the October Revolution called "coup or crime" voice. However, the old Soviet people who had a socialist complex had always believed that the October Revolution not only allowed the Soviet Union, the first socialist country in the world to come into being, but also had an impact on the capitalist world, "forcing these countries to improve their welfare for the people."
"We live in history of schizophrenia", "The New York Times" quoted Russian retired general, historian Leonid Rachel Nickov as saying. The general said in a forum that once he tried to explain to his granddaughter, why the Russian city of Yekaterinburg had a church dedicated to the tsar and his family as a saint, and a memorial that was shot Kill the monument to the local Bolshevik commander.
3. Putin's attitude
As the times changed, the way the Russian government celebrated the October Revolution changed. The Soviet Union on November 7 each year, the Red Square will be held on the grand "October Revolution Victory Day" parade, held in 1990 the last one. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Russian official no longer celebrated, this day as a rest day. In 1996, Russian President Boris Yeltsin set the day as "harmonious reconciliation day". In 2005, Putin signed the law will be restored on October 7 to October Revolution Day, but this day is no longer a public holiday. On the day of the Red Square parade, is to commemorate the 1941 German troops under the Moscow city, the Red Army in the inspection directly after the opening of the legendary red field parade.
Today, the Russian political parties differ in their views of 1917. The Russian Communist Party believes that if there is no Bolshevik power, Russia may no longer exist. Russian Communist Party Duldari Valery Rushkin has put forward a motion to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution, Lenin's head should be printed on ruble coins to cherish the socialist country's founder.
In contrast, the Russian Liberal Democratic Party's position is more negative, the party members Leibe Jeff believes that "a great country was destroyed in 1917." Russian Liberal Democrat President Rinovsky has been supporting the removal of Lenin's remains from the tomb of Lenin in Red Square. "It was a square for celebrating events, festivals and parades, and Lenin destroyed all the best things in the Tsarist Russia, and it was He opened the Second World War.
Russian President Vladimir Putin's attitude is the most concerned about the outside world. On December 1 last year, Putin said in his State of the Union address that the February Revolution and the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution show that Russia has experienced too much turbulence over the past century. In 2017, the entire Russian community needed a frank and in-depth evaluation of the causes and effects of the revolution, "and never allowed the divisions, resentment, resentment and coldness of our past into our present life."
In January 2016, Putin, speaking at the All-Russian Popular Front Forum, said that he still maintained the Soviet Communist Party membership card, and he still liked communism and socialism.
However, in August 2014, when Putin discussed the historical issues with middle school students in a summer camp, he said that the violent shaking of the Russian internal regime in 1917 eventually led to the collapse of the country from the inside.
In the view of Chinese scholars, Putin's view of the 1917 revolution, showing two sides. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Russian expert expert Wu Enyuan 16 days to accept the "Global Times" reporter said that on the one hand, Putin, including the October Revolution, including the Russian history, said respect. He believes that if there is no overthrow of the tsarist government, then the war did not win the war, during World War II to win the fascism is also the Soviet government's credit, coupled with the 1950s to eliminate illiteracy, the Russians, especially the workers and peasants group life improved, The Communist Party has done a lot of useful things. On the other hand, Putin argued that the shooting of the tsarist Romanov family in the October Revolution was inhumane; the Soviet Union system, which was free to join and withdrew, was a time bomb that led to its disintegration. "Putin wants to eliminate the lessons of the past, so he is talking about commemorating these revolutions, emphasizing unity and harmony." Wu said.
A media man working in Russia told the Global Times that during the decade after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Russian academics had experienced a period of denial of all historical nihilism in the field of ideology. Starting from Putin's ruling, the Russians began to look at major historical events again.
"Although some people think that Russia in 1917 into a catastrophe, but its logo is still deeply embedded in their daily lives." "New York Times" is the evaluation. In any case, the October Revolution and later the Soviet Union, and Russia still rely on the military strength, industrial base, social security system is closely related. And under the influence of Putin's dream, more and more young people began to like the Soviet Union they had never experienced.
"In recent years, the Russian people's interest in the socialist revolution and the history of the Soviet Union has risen." 100 years ago, inequality between social strata gave birth to the October Revolution. The Soviet Union, medical, education, housing and other social welfare is very good now Russia Is facing the gap between rich and poor, lack of social management and other issues, which need to be ruled to solve the history of the lessons worthy of reference today. "Russian scientific ideology and political ideology research center director Stepan Suraka real "Global Times" reporter said.
100 years later, Russia how to see the 1917 revolution
[The Global Times Comprehensive Report] Editor's note: "the end of hundreds of years of monarchy, the establishment of the Soviet regime, irreversibly changed the history", the law and society with this sentence summed up the Russian 1917 years. This year, Russia has erupted the February Revolution, the October Revolution, for the strong Soviet era kicked off. In 2017, this revolutionary era ushered in the 100th anniversary, for its interpretation of Russian public opinion in the constant response. Russia, which has experienced the disintegration of the Soviet Union, is now more complex in its 1917 revolution: some argue that it has brought the best of times in the country; it has been said that the process of national development has been hampered. Russian President Vladimir Putin is in charge of the Russian society around the revolution for frank and in-depth evaluation, "will not allow the past split, resentment, resentment and cold pull into our present life."
1. 500 commemorative activities, but to avoid politicization
"In Russia, March 12 is usually considered the starting point of the revolution." Long-term focus on Russia moving to the United States, "New York Times", as if to explore the "abnormal" political signal generally said, "100 years after the March 12 Not the national holidays, the Russian government did not publish similar to commemorate the victory of World War II, said it is 'great victory' official statement.
March 12, 1917, the tsarist system collapsed; the same year on November 7, the October Revolution victory, the establishment of the Soviet regime. Two revolution for the Soviet era laid the foundation for the history of Russia is a heavy color. However, in the Western media view, 100 years after the Russian people do not seem to know how to look at the revolutionary years of 1917, how to commemorate the issue of some "tangled." At the same time, some commemorative activities "cautious", as low as possible. According to the Russian "Opinion" reported that the Russian government did not organize activities during the February Revolution Memorial Day, the media did not carry out a large number of reports, but some areas held a small commemorative activities.
Travel Association "World Without Borders" staff told the "Global Times" reporter, many Chinese tourists with Soviet complex look forward to the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution to catch up with large-scale celebrations, but commemorative activities more concentrated in the history of the world, Russia There is no plan to hold large festivals.
In December last year, the Russian History Society established a committee dedicated to the plan for the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution, based on President Putin's order. President of the Russian Presidential Administration's Social Project Management Department,
Zenikovic said the commemoration would be commemorated in the historical context, and he called for not politicizing it. Agence France-Presse said that Russia is currently preparing to host 500 meetings, round tables, exhibitions and arts festivals to commemorate 1917. The President of the Moscow International Institute of International Relations Anatoly Torkunov was appointed head of the Commission's official commissions, composed of filmmakers, journalists and religious leaders. Torkukov said that the committee was not governed by the Kremlin.
British Art News website said that because the Russian society in 1917 two revolutions and the Soviet Union there is a contradictory mentality, so the Russian museum in the relevant exhibition will take as far as possible without controversy. "If a museum has a collection of 1917-related collections, works of art, etc., it is possible to choose to hold a collection-related exhibition," said historian and curator Anatoly Gruber Weissky. The St. Petersburg Alminas Museum takes the initiative to focus on the exhibition of tsars and their families. The museum's exhibition in the Netherlands will return to St. Petersburg later this year. This exhibition will showcase the "Tsar's Choice and Decide How to Make the Revolution Unusual". The museum director of the Russian National Museum in St. Petersburg said the museum will host a "exhibition of people's lives and art" about historical events.
It is said that the Russian National Museum of History in Red Square in Moscow will also organize exhibitions. "We have to face everything that happened at the time and what happened: this is our common history, and we must be brave to say that we must not forget the remarkable achievements and victories that we have achieved," said the museum curator.
Agence France-Presse said that the Russian government would like to take low-key to celebrate the spirit of dilapidating the revolution in 1917, "warned not to riots." However, at the meeting of the Research Memorial Program Committee, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Agency, Narezkin, made a different interpretation - the 100th anniversary event was designed to commemorate and understand, not to celebrate, Break the people. "For some people, the 1917 revolution was the death of the 'big Russia', 'off Europe', so that we stopped the development in Europe." Russian Presidential Cultural Affairs Special Representative Mikhail Shivideco "For many other people, the Soviet era is the best of their lives," he said. He said that Putin is committed to unite the whole country, "any national level of celebration will exacerbate these differences."
2. "Two distinct views on the collision"
"Differentiation", which is concerned about the Russian society for the October Revolution leader Lenin, 1917 revolution and its follow-up views, the highest frequency of a word.
Agence France-Presse said that for the 1917 revolution, the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 was an important turning point, "the public is increasingly no longer regarded as a victory of these revolutions, but triggered several generations of Russians into the tragedy of suffering." "The disappearance of the monarchy has caused the country to be in anarchy and later into a civil war, and millions of people have lost their lives," said Peter Arkopov, editor-in-chief of the Russian political journal. Russian history professor Vladimir Lavrov said the revolution "led to the collapse of the Millennium empire."
A poll conducted by the Russian "New Area" website on the eve of the October 2016 Revolution Day shows that 28.95% of respondents believe that this is one of the most important events of the 20th century. 23.16% of people said that the November 7 revolution to promote the national development. 24.65% of the respondents said that this is a disaster for Russia, is the beginning of the end of the great nation. Another survey of the Levada Center shows that 21% of respondents believe that the monarchy is the end of the Russian disaster, 13% of people hold a positive view. For Lenin, 40% of the Russian people view positive, 20% of the respondents negative attitude.
65-year-old Moscow citizen Yulia has a deep affection for the Soviet Union. She told the "Global Times" reporter said that it was the October Revolution, the Soviet Union was able to build, she was attached to the Soviet Union during the social progress and national strong. In her view, "Lenin is a hero."
Lenin was very diligent, working 16 hours a day, with a great deal of philosophy and political work, and he commanded the revolution in less than a year and then introduced new economic policies and rebuilt the country in five years. The economy soon returned to pre-war levels, and he was a great leader. "45-year-old Anton thought Lenin was a genius.
And the 36-year-old photographer, Yevgeny, had a different view. "The organizers of the October Revolution had a good will to resist the exploitation of capitalists and let the masses of workers and peasants be the masters, but the revolution opened the brutal civil war."
For the October Revolution, there were young people who were not interested. Natasha, a 98-year-old journalist in Moscow, told the Global Times reporter that the time has elapsed for a long time ... Russia's economy is now poor and housing and other expenses are high. Think of that old age.
"Over the past two decades, there have been two distinct views on the October Revolution, which has been in the public eye, and the academic community has collided with it." Director of the Russian Center for Scientific Thought and Political Ideology, "Global Times" reporter said that after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the liberals away from the Soviet ideology, emphasizing the new concept, and began to appear in the October Revolution called "coup or crime" voice. However, the old Soviet people who had a socialist complex had always believed that the October Revolution not only allowed the Soviet Union, the first socialist country in the world to come into being, but also had an impact on the capitalist world, "forcing these countries to improve their welfare for the people."
"We live in history of schizophrenia", "The New York Times" quoted Russian retired general, historian Leonid Rachel Nickov as saying. The general said in a forum that once he tried to explain to his granddaughter, why the Russian city of Yekaterinburg had a church dedicated to the tsar and his family as a saint, and a memorial that was shot Kill the monument to the local Bolshevik commander.
3. Putin's attitude
As the times changed, the way the Russian government celebrated the October Revolution changed. The Soviet Union on November 7 each year, the Red Square will be held on the grand "October Revolution Victory Day" parade, held in 1990 the last one. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Russian official no longer celebrated, this day as a rest day. In 1996, Russian President Boris Yeltsin set the day as "harmonious reconciliation day". In 2005, Putin signed the law will be restored on October 7 to October Revolution Day, but this day is no longer a public holiday. On the day of the Red Square parade, is to commemorate the 1941 German troops under the Moscow city, the Red Army in the inspection directly after the opening of the legendary red field parade.
Today, the Russian political parties differ in their views of 1917. The Russian Communist Party believes that if there is no Bolshevik power, Russia may no longer exist. Russian Communist Party Duldari Valery Rushkin has put forward a motion to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution, Lenin's head should be printed on ruble coins to cherish the socialist country's founder.
In contrast, the Russian Liberal Democratic Party's position is more negative, the party members Leibe Jeff believes that "a great country was destroyed in 1917." Russian Liberal Democrat President Rinovsky has been supporting the removal of Lenin's remains from the tomb of Lenin in Red Square. "It was a square for celebrating events, festivals and parades, and Lenin destroyed all the best things in the Tsarist Russia, and it was He opened the Second World War.
Russian President Vladimir Putin's attitude is the most concerned about the outside world. On December 1 last year, Putin said in his State of the Union address that the February Revolution and the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution show that Russia has experienced too much turbulence over the past century. In 2017, the entire Russian community needed a frank and in-depth evaluation of the causes and effects of the revolution, "and never allowed the divisions, resentment, resentment and coldness of our past into our present life."
In January 2016, Putin, speaking at the All-Russian Popular Front Forum, said that he still maintained the Soviet Communist Party membership card, and he still liked communism and socialism.
However, in August 2014, when Putin discussed the historical issues with middle school students in a summer camp, he said that the violent shaking of the Russian internal regime in 1917 eventually led to the collapse of the country from the inside.
In the view of Chinese scholars, Putin's view of the 1917 revolution, showing two sides. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Russian expert expert Wu Enyuan 16 days to accept the "Global Times" reporter said that on the one hand, Putin, including the October Revolution, including the Russian history, said respect. He believes that if there is no overthrow of the tsarist government, then the war did not win the war, during World War II to win the fascism is also the Soviet government's credit, coupled with the 1950s to eliminate illiteracy, the Russians, especially the workers and peasants group life improved, The Communist Party has done a lot of useful things. On the other hand, Putin argued that the shooting of the tsarist Romanov family in the October Revolution was inhumane; the Soviet Union system, which was free to join and withdrew, was a time bomb that led to its disintegration. "Putin wants to eliminate the lessons of the past, so he is talking about commemorating these revolutions, emphasizing unity and harmony." Wu said.
A media man working in Russia told the Global Times that during the decade after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Russian academics had experienced a period of denial of all historical nihilism in the field of ideology. Starting from Putin's ruling, the Russians began to look at major historical events again.
"Although some people think that Russia in 1917 into a catastrophe, but its logo is still deeply embedded in their daily lives." "New York Times" is the evaluation. In any case, the October Revolution and later the Soviet Union, and Russia still rely on the military strength, industrial base, social security system is closely related. And under the influence of Putin's dream, more and more young people began to like the Soviet Union they had never experienced.
"In recent years, the Russian people's interest in the socialist revolution and the history of the Soviet Union has risen." 100 years ago, inequality between social strata gave birth to the October Revolution. The Soviet Union, medical, education, housing and other social welfare is very good now Russia Is facing the gap between rich and poor, lack of social management and other issues, which need to be ruled to solve the history of the lessons worthy of reference today. "Russian scientific ideology and political ideology research center director Stepan Suraka real "Global Times" reporter said.
订阅:
博文 (Atom)







